The final scoping report for Eskom's proposed new nuclear plant, the PBMR, has been completed and is now open to the public for comment. This is an important stage in the Environmental Impact Assessment being undertaken.
 
 
Media
Earthlife wins right to appeal 07 Jul 2006
Court Ruling on Pebble Bed Reactor 03 June 2003
ELA Shocked 26 June 2003
Countdown to deadline of appeal 21 July 2003
Nukes vs Climate Change 14 Aug 2003
Flawed Appeal Process 20 Aug 2003
Huge support for Earthlife 25 Aug 2003
Next Round of Court Action 15 Sept 2003
Cancer Risk 22 Jan 2004
ELA welcomes Nuclear Summit 02 Feb 2004
Koeberg's Secret Horror 06 Feb 2004
Nuclear Summit cancelled 17 Feb 2004
Who's Bluffing 04 Mar 2004
Cancer Risk Raised Again 08 Mar 2004
Cape Town at risk 21 May 2004
Call for a Nuclear summit 02 Jun 2004
Demand for Nuclear summit 04 Jun 2004
Nuclear is Definately Avoidable. 22 Jun 2004
Victory for ELA 26 Jan 2005
Cabinet Accepts Court Judgement 8 Feb 2005
National Budget Speech 25 Feb 2005
Protect our Children 21 Apr 2005
Unguarded Site 25 Apr 2005
ELA Call for Investigation 30 Apr 2005
New NNR Head Destrys Credibility 25 May 2005
Power Failures Reveal Safety risks 19 Nov 2005
ELA Loses Case for Eskom's Board Minutes 15 Dec 20
Court Ruling on Pebble Bed Reactor 03 June 2003
COURT RULING ON PEBBLE BED NUCLEAR REACTOR RESULTS 3rd June 2003. 

For the past 2 years, Earthlife Africa has been trying to participate meaningfully in a complex process which aims to assess the risks and benefits of the proposed PBMR (pebble bed modular reactor) from an environmental, economic and social point of view.

 

Last week, Earthlife Africa Cape Town put in an urgent appeal to the court to stop the Dept of Environmental Affairs making a decision before a fair hearing had taken place.

The results of the court case earlier today showed clearly that Earthlife Africa is respected as an environmental lobby group acting in the public interest.  While the court felt that the urgent application was not justified, the judge ruled that no costs should be brought against ELA CT. ELA can still continue with the court case, and argue for a right to a hearing before the decision gets made. Our lawyers, the Legal Resource Centre, are confident that we have a strong case.   “We still believe we have a constitutional right to be heard but because the court did not find that our application for urgency was justified, we have no guarantee that DEAT will not make a decision even as events unfold” said spokesperson Liz McDaid. However, the implications of an expansion of the nuclear programme within South Africa and Africa are quite sobering.  In light of the recent health studies and the huge financial burden of the BNFL nuclear waste clean up, we would hope that the decision-makers would be taking this into account and accordingly reject the PBMR.    Earthlife Africa will be hosting a breakfast to celebrate World Environment Day on the 5th June, in Cape Town where the Legal Resource Centre will unpack the court challenge.  Representatives of the media are invited to join us.