The final scoping report for Eskom's proposed new nuclear plant, the PBMR, has been completed and is now open to the public for comment. This is an important stage in the Environmental Impact Assessment being undertaken.
 
 
Media
Earthlife wins right to appeal 07 Jul 2006
Court Ruling on Pebble Bed Reactor 03 June 2003
ELA Shocked 26 June 2003
Countdown to deadline of appeal 21 July 2003
Nukes vs Climate Change 14 Aug 2003
Flawed Appeal Process 20 Aug 2003
Huge support for Earthlife 25 Aug 2003
Next Round of Court Action 15 Sept 2003
Cancer Risk 22 Jan 2004
ELA welcomes Nuclear Summit 02 Feb 2004
Koeberg's Secret Horror 06 Feb 2004
Nuclear Summit cancelled 17 Feb 2004
Who's Bluffing 04 Mar 2004
Cancer Risk Raised Again 08 Mar 2004
Cape Town at risk 21 May 2004
Call for a Nuclear summit 02 Jun 2004
Demand for Nuclear summit 04 Jun 2004
Nuclear is Definately Avoidable. 22 Jun 2004
Victory for ELA 26 Jan 2005
Cabinet Accepts Court Judgement 8 Feb 2005
National Budget Speech 25 Feb 2005
Protect our Children 21 Apr 2005
Unguarded Site 25 Apr 2005
ELA Call for Investigation 30 Apr 2005
New NNR Head Destrys Credibility 25 May 2005
Power Failures Reveal Safety risks 19 Nov 2005
ELA Loses Case for Eskom's Board Minutes 15 Dec 20
Protect our Children 21 Apr 2005

Press release 21 Apr 2005.

WHO’S PROTECTING OUR CHILDREN FROM NUKES?

On the 22nd April Earth Day marks its 35th anniversary, a worldwide movement to protect our planet. This year the theme is Protecting Our Children's Health and Our Future. Despite the extraordinary obstacles that we face in our efforts to protect our natural resources, few will dare argue with the moral duty we have to protect our children from harm.

 As a city with a nuclear reactor on our doorstep, it is critical that there is some form of credible protective body that is designed to protect the public interest. The National Nuclear Regulator (NNR) is supposedly one of these protectors; an independent institution to provide for the protection against nuclear damage through the establishment of safety standards and regulatory practices. 

However, the NNR has proposed as their new CEO, a man who, according to April Noseweek, also happens to be employed by the Pebble Bed Modular Reactor (PBMR) company.

“The idea of the nuclear industry policing itself makes a mockery of the regulator” said Olivia Andrews, nuclear campaigner. Environmental NGO, Earthlife Africa, is investigating the issue further and will consult with its legal team regarding any further action in this regard. 

The ANC expressed a decidedly anti nuclear view before they came into power in 1994, but now, as government, they have a different view. Without government support, the PBMR would probably have collapsed. Could the push towards nuclear power be motivated by corruption? It would seem that the people who are pushing PBMR are the people who stand to make a sound profit if the demo project goes ahead (whether or not it is successful). Noseweek reported that should the demo reactor be successful the plan is to sell 240 reactors, of which 216 would be sold in the international market at an estimated US$225-million per reactor. Is greed and corruption deciding the course of the future of the children in South Africa?