The final scoping report for Eskom's proposed new nuclear plant, the PBMR, has been completed and is now open to the public for comment. This is an important stage in the Environmental Impact Assessment being undertaken.
 
 
Media
Earthlife wins right to appeal 07 Jul 2006
Court Ruling on Pebble Bed Reactor 03 June 2003
ELA Shocked 26 June 2003
Countdown to deadline of appeal 21 July 2003
Nukes vs Climate Change 14 Aug 2003
Flawed Appeal Process 20 Aug 2003
Huge support for Earthlife 25 Aug 2003
Next Round of Court Action 15 Sept 2003
Cancer Risk 22 Jan 2004
ELA welcomes Nuclear Summit 02 Feb 2004
Koeberg's Secret Horror 06 Feb 2004
Nuclear Summit cancelled 17 Feb 2004
Who's Bluffing 04 Mar 2004
Cancer Risk Raised Again 08 Mar 2004
Cape Town at risk 21 May 2004
Call for a Nuclear summit 02 Jun 2004
Demand for Nuclear summit 04 Jun 2004
Nuclear is Definately Avoidable. 22 Jun 2004
Victory for ELA 26 Jan 2005
Cabinet Accepts Court Judgement 8 Feb 2005
National Budget Speech 25 Feb 2005
Protect our Children 21 Apr 2005
Unguarded Site 25 Apr 2005
ELA Call for Investigation 30 Apr 2005
New NNR Head Destrys Credibility 25 May 2005
Power Failures Reveal Safety risks 19 Nov 2005
ELA Loses Case for Eskom's Board Minutes 15 Dec 20
Earthlife wins right to appeal 07 Jul 2006

 Earthlife wins right to appeal

Press Release:7 July 2006

The Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) yesterday granted Earthlife Africa Cape Town (ELA CT) leave to appeal the earlier judgement of Acting Judge of the High Court, Judge Fevrier, in the Eskom Board Minutes Court Case. The SCA also set aside the costs order in the leave to appeal application. ELA CT commends the SCA for recognizing the validity of this application and ensuring that the law is applied equitably. In 2005 ELA CT launched an application for access to Eskom Board Minutes pertaining to the Pebble Bed Modular Reactor (PBMR). ELA CT is represented by the Open Democracy Advice Centre in this matter. The application is filed using the Promotion of Access to Information Act. It was hoped that these documents would provide Eskom’s rationale for failing to supply adequate information on the health impacts and economics of the PBMR. It is important that ELA gains access to Eskom’s relevant Board minutes before the EIA of the PBMR is completed. The National Environmental Management Act (ch5) requires that an EIA take full account of the expected environmental, social and economic impacts of a project. It is believed by ELA CT that such information is essential for South African taxpayers to have when R16 billion will be spent on this project. Earthlife Africa Cape Town and the Open Democracy Advice Centre are vindicated that the spirit of the law has been upheld and looks forward to seeing justice done when this matter is argued at the SCA.