The final scoping report for Eskom's proposed new nuclear plant, the PBMR, has been completed and is now open to the public for comment. This is an important stage in the Environmental Impact Assessment being undertaken.
 
 
Media
Earthlife wins right to appeal 07 Jul 2006
Court Ruling on Pebble Bed Reactor 03 June 2003
ELA Shocked 26 June 2003
Countdown to deadline of appeal 21 July 2003
Nukes vs Climate Change 14 Aug 2003
Flawed Appeal Process 20 Aug 2003
Huge support for Earthlife 25 Aug 2003
Next Round of Court Action 15 Sept 2003
Cancer Risk 22 Jan 2004
ELA welcomes Nuclear Summit 02 Feb 2004
Koeberg's Secret Horror 06 Feb 2004
Nuclear Summit cancelled 17 Feb 2004
Who's Bluffing 04 Mar 2004
Cancer Risk Raised Again 08 Mar 2004
Cape Town at risk 21 May 2004
Call for a Nuclear summit 02 Jun 2004
Demand for Nuclear summit 04 Jun 2004
Nuclear is Definately Avoidable. 22 Jun 2004
Victory for ELA 26 Jan 2005
Cabinet Accepts Court Judgement 8 Feb 2005
National Budget Speech 25 Feb 2005
Protect our Children 21 Apr 2005
Unguarded Site 25 Apr 2005
ELA Call for Investigation 30 Apr 2005
New NNR Head Destrys Credibility 25 May 2005
Power Failures Reveal Safety risks 19 Nov 2005
ELA Loses Case for Eskom's Board Minutes 15 Dec 20
Demand for Nuclear summit 04 Jun 2004

Joint press release:  EJNF, Earthlife Africa, COSATU, NUM, NUMSA, SACBC

Demand for Nuclear Summit

A parliamentary summit, in which pro and anti-nuclear proponents and experts would put their cases to the combined portfolio committees of environment and tourism and minerals and energy, was cancelled days before it was due to take place (on 16 and 17 February).
A nuclear summit would have provided an opportunity for those of us who have been speaking out against nuclear energy to voice our views.  Affected communities and organizations have tried to participate in official processes such as the Environmental Impact Assessment for the proposed PBMR and the new radioactive waste policy but with the odds stacked against us.

The challenges are enormous.  The subject is highly technical and community concerns are largely ignored.  In our view, the nuclear industry is a relict of a bygone age when the environmental degradation counted for nothing.  Even high flying businessmen like Clem Sunter are advocating a new road where profit is not the prime motive for business.  The World Summit on Sustainable Development committed the world to sustainable development - development which occurs within the limits of the earth's recovery systems.  Long lived nuclear waste (over 240 000 years before it is safe) produced by nuclear reactors is not sustainable development.  The billions of rands being poured into nuclear industry will benefit who - certainly not ordinary South Africans.

The nuclear summit provides organizations like us with a platform to put our views, and should enable technical experts to provide information to counter the nuclear propaganda put out by the nuclear industry. 

We believe that if any rational parliamentarian listens to all sides of the story, there is only one conclusion they can come to - nuclear power is not for South Africa - and our country is not to be used as a dumping ground for nuclear waste.

The previous parliament stated that the summit was not cancelled but postponed.  We therefore call on parliament to hold the nuclear summit, to listen to the people, before it is too late.


All the undersigned organizations endorse the call for the nuclear summit to be held now.

Sibusiso Mimi