The final scoping report for Eskom's proposed new nuclear plant, the PBMR, has been completed and is now open to the public for comment. This is an important stage in the Environmental Impact Assessment being undertaken.
 
 
Media
Earthlife wins right to appeal 07 Jul 2006
Court Ruling on Pebble Bed Reactor 03 June 2003
ELA Shocked 26 June 2003
Countdown to deadline of appeal 21 July 2003
Nukes vs Climate Change 14 Aug 2003
Flawed Appeal Process 20 Aug 2003
Huge support for Earthlife 25 Aug 2003
Next Round of Court Action 15 Sept 2003
Cancer Risk 22 Jan 2004
ELA welcomes Nuclear Summit 02 Feb 2004
Koeberg's Secret Horror 06 Feb 2004
Nuclear Summit cancelled 17 Feb 2004
Who's Bluffing 04 Mar 2004
Cancer Risk Raised Again 08 Mar 2004
Cape Town at risk 21 May 2004
Call for a Nuclear summit 02 Jun 2004
Demand for Nuclear summit 04 Jun 2004
Nuclear is Definately Avoidable. 22 Jun 2004
Victory for ELA 26 Jan 2005
Cabinet Accepts Court Judgement 8 Feb 2005
National Budget Speech 25 Feb 2005
Protect our Children 21 Apr 2005
Unguarded Site 25 Apr 2005
ELA Call for Investigation 30 Apr 2005
New NNR Head Destrys Credibility 25 May 2005
Power Failures Reveal Safety risks 19 Nov 2005
ELA Loses Case for Eskom's Board Minutes 15 Dec 20
Nukes vs Climate Change 14 Aug 2003

Nukes vs Climate Change?

Press Release 14 August 2003

The last few days have seen red faces all over the European nuclear industry as it faces the heat.

Nuclear energy it seems, far from being the often cried solution to climate change, appears to fail dismally under extreme climate conditions.  Because of the extreme heat generated in nuclear reactions, coolant is an absolute necessity. At temperatures of 50 degrees C, safety systems breakdown.  In Europe temperatures reached 48 degrees, resulting a shut down of half of nuclear power stations in France.

Of more concern is the apparent disregard for safety standards when put under pressure.  In order to minimize electricity shut downs, reactors were allowed to disregard  environmental standards, releasing higher temperature water into the ecosystem.

What will the impact of this extra heated water be on the pipes.  The cooling system will be under pressure, leaks in the pipes may develop, pipes may fracture.

Surely the most sensible thing to do is to shut down the reactors until the ambient temperature returns to safe levels for operating a nuclear reactor.

It appears that the attempt to keep the nuclear industry going at all costs is more about nuclear engineers saving face.  The engineers are determined to solve the problem despite the risks to the environment and public.

The lessons are clear.  Nuclear power generates few benefits but carries enormous risks.
For South Africa, the European crisis provides a small window into the future if we proceed down the nuclear road.

We are at the crossroads, let us take the alternative route.  Renewable energy will provide jobs, electricity on a sustainable basis without the risks.  Rather than perpetuating the excesses of dirty energy of the past, let us take the high road, focusing on clean, environmentally cool energy!